|        
       Goals of AP Election 
        Watch 2004 Immediate state-level goals: 1. FDR/Lok Satta's 
        earlier EW efforts in 98' and 99' were successful in arresting the process 
        of criminalization. As a result no new candidates entered the political 
        arena, even though established candidates who have struck deep political 
        roots continued to be in the fray. This time, we propose to go one step 
        ahead and ensure that even the established and entrenched politicians 
        with criminal/corrupt antecedents are not fielded by major parties and 
        thereby reverse the process of criminalization. We will caution  the parties well 
        in advance that if they field any candidates with a criminal record, we 
        will ask the people not to vote for them. Given FDR/Lok Satta's credibility 
        and support base in the state, we are confident that the parties will 
        respond to our plea positively.  2. To influence the 
        governance agenda, irrespective of which party or candidates are elected. 
        Specifically we will focus on local government empowerment, enactment 
        of a law for constituting local courts to deliver speedy justice in the 
        local language and instruments of accountability such as right to information 
        and citizen's charters with proivision for penalties. We will endeavour 
        to make health care and school education as the center-piece of any new 
        government's governance agenda.  3. To help clean up 
        the electoral process within the state, given the limitations of the electoral 
        system.  Medium-term National goals: 1. Bring to the fore 
        certain issues pertaining to the electoral and governance process that 
        are so far concealed from the public eye in a dramatic fashion. For example 
        highlight the effect of criminalization and link corruption to the first-past-the 
        post system of elections and parliamentary executive in states and make 
        a compelling case for switching over to direct election of chief executive 
        at the state level and for proportional representation. 2. By doing so, mobilize public opinion in favour of the reform process 
        and impact political parties behaviour.
 3. Launch a national campaign to enact required legal and constitutional 
        changes to give effect to our advocacy.
     |